They believe the case should remain in Fulton County Superior Court. These actions were explicitly political in nature and are illegal under the Hatch Act, which restricts partisan political activity by federal employees, they wrote in a response to Meadows' notice of removal to federal court. Willis' team argues that the actions in question were meant solely to keep Trump in office. He frequently answered that the federal interest was in ensuring accurate and fair elections, but she accused him several times of not answering her questions. In the cross-examination, prosecutor Anna Cross ticked through the same acts to ask Meadows what federal policy was being advanced in each of them. For most of the acts listed, Meadows said he had performed them as part of his official duty. The lawyer then walked him through the acts alleged in the indictment to ask if he had done those as part of his job. Terwilliger III quickly called his client to the stand and asked him about his duties as Trump's chief of staff. It was unclear when the judge planned to make his decision.ĭuring Monday's hearing, Meadows attorney George J. District Judge Steve Jones to move the case to federal court to halt any proceedings against him at the state level. Lawyers for Meadows argue that his actions that gave rise to the charges in the indictment "all occurred during his tenure and as part of his service as chief of staff." They argue that he did nothing criminal and that the charges against him should be dismissed, and they want U.S. In Washington, a judge overseeing a federal case over charges that Trump sought to illegally subvert the results of the 2020 election set a trial date for March 4, 2024, right in the heart of the presidential primary calendar. Monday's hearing in Georgia involved just one of four criminal cases that Trump is currently facing. Clark at the top of the department to carry out that plan.The testimony from Trump's former chief of staff came as two of the former president's attorneys listened attentively in the courtroom. The investigations were opened after a New York Times article that detailed efforts by Jeffrey Clark, the acting head of the Justice Department’s civil division, to push top leaders to falsely and publicly assert that continuing election fraud investigations cast doubt on the Electoral College results. Rosen had a two-hour meeting on Friday with the Justice Department’s office of the inspector general and provided closed-door testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Saturday. Trump subvert the results of the 2020 election, according to a person familiar with the interviews. Rosen, who was acting attorney general during the Trump administration, has told the Justice Department watchdog and congressional investigators that one of his deputies tried to help former President Donald J. The testimony highlights the former president’s desire to batter the Justice Department into advancing his personal agenda.Įffrey A. Former Acting Attorney General Testifies About Trump's Efforts to Subvert Election
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |